Ethereum mainnet · Live on-chain comparison
Curve vs SushiSwap
Compare Curve and SushiSwap Ethereum liquidity, volume, active addresses, trades and pool coverage.
Data updated Jul 28, 2026, 9:11 PM UTC
| Metric | Curve | SushiSwap |
|---|---|---|
| TVL | $1.36B | $26.83M |
| Volume 24h | $71.06M | $1.90M |
| Volume 7d | $108.71M | $2.52M |
| Active addresses 24h | 832 | 291 |
| Trades 24h | 6,852 | 2,018 |
| Tracked pools | 292 | 20 |
| Volume / TVL | 5.22% | 7.08% |
Curve vs SushiSwap: what the data shows
Curve concentrates much of its design around stable or correlated assets, while the tracked SushiSwap V3 pools use concentrated liquidity across a broader AMM model.
TVL differences should be read alongside market composition. A large correlated-asset pool and a volatile concentrated-liquidity pool can have different execution behavior even when their USD TVL is similar.
Curve currently has the higher Ethereum TVL at $1.36B, compared with $26.83M for SushiSwap. Curve currently has the higher 24-hour Ethereum volume at $71.06M, compared with $1.90M for SushiSwap.
How to read this comparison
A higher value is not a universal quality score. TVL describes qualifying liquidity, volume and trades show recent indexed use, and volume-to-TVL estimates how intensively liquidity was used in the last 24 hours. The figures use the same Ethereum mainnet scope on both sides.
Frequently asked questions
Which has more TVL, Curve or SushiSwap?
Curve currently has the higher Ethereum TVL at $1.36B, compared with $26.83M for SushiSwap.
Which has more trading volume, Curve or SushiSwap?
Curve currently has the higher 24-hour Ethereum volume at $71.06M, compared with $1.90M for SushiSwap.
Are active addresses the same as unique users?
No. CoinVerum counts distinct observed Ethereum transaction senders. Routers, aggregators and smart accounts can represent activity from multiple people.
Explore Curve analytics and SushiSwap analytics, inspect their Curve pools and SushiSwap pools, or review the data methodology.